Chitta and vritti in the Yoga Sutras

What chitta includes

Iyengar treats chitta as consciousness and distinguishes three functions within it. Manas is associated with the mind and sense impressions, buddhi with discernment, and ahamkara with the sense of being the one who acts. These philosophical terms help Iyengar describe a practitioner’s experience.

Five kinds of vritti

The sutras name valid knowledge, mistaken knowledge, verbal construction without a corresponding object, sleep, and memory. Vritti therefore includes such different activities as reaching a sound judgment and recalling an earlier experience. Consider an unexpected sound. Hearing it gives you an impression. Guessing its source may lead to a mistake. Remembering it later belongs to another category.

Reading the definition of yoga

Sutras I.3–I.4 distinguish the seer abiding in its own nature from identification with the movements of consciousness. This distinction helps explain why the operation of chitta matters so much in Iyengar’s account.

Three ways of arriving at knowledge

Iyengar singles out pramana, or valid knowledge, for close examination. Patanjali identifies direct perception, sound inference, and authoritative testimony as ways of arriving at it. Seeing a wet sidewalk is direct perception. Concluding that it rained is an inference that depends on what else you know. Accepting an account from a reliable witness is another kind of evidence. Each can contribute something different, and each deserves care. A garden sprinkler could explain the wet sidewalk just as well as rain.

How words and memory shape what we notice

Vikalpa, the category associated with verbal construction, helps explain how language can create a picture in the mind. If someone describes an event that has yet to occur, you may already have a detailed image of it. The image is a real mental event. The imagined occasion may never take place. Memory works differently. It brings an earlier experience into the present as a recollection, and what comes back can influence which details stand out now.

An ordinary moment with several movements

Imagine reading a message and immediately concluding that the sender is annoyed. The words are available to perception. The interpretation of their tone is an inference, which might be mistaken. An earlier disagreement may come to mind as memory. Imagining the next conversation adds another layer. Iyengar’s reading invites this kind of discrimination. Asking what you observed, what you inferred, and what you remembered can make a single, apparently simple experience easier to understand.

What the list clarifies

Before asking what steadies the mind, Patanjali draws attention to the variety of things it does. That variety is easy to miss if we use vritti as a synonym for distraction.

Related articles

• Kleshas and antarayas in yoga practice
• Pratyahara and the role of the senses